/image%2F8357444%2F20250531%2Fob_e5372f_safitexpers.jpeg)
/image%2F7127247%2F20251026%2Fob_00b464_comparatif-firewall-bsd-windows-macos.png)
Complete technical comparison of 2025 firewall solutions: pfSense, nftables, Windows Defender. Active CVEs, verified benchmarks, updated expert guide.
Firewall Effectiveness Comparison 2025: Complete Updated Guide
Complete technical comparison of firewall solutions by platform: BSD, Linux, Windows, macOS
📋 Executive Key Points
Key Points Overview
Complete Coverage: Evidence-based analysis of open-source firewalls (pfSense, OPNsense, nftables) and native solutions (Windows Defender, macOS), with verified 2025 data
Active Vulnerabilities
Active Vulnerabilities: CVE-2025-53392 (pfSense), CVE-2025-50989 (OPNsense), CVE-2025-53808 (Windows Defender) require urgent patching
Verified Performance
Verified Performance: All figures are sourced and contextualized by hardware (pfSense: 28.6 Gbps on Netgate 8300)
🔍 Overview
2025 Cybersecurity Context
In the constantly evolving cybersecurity landscape of 2025, firewalls remain the cornerstone of network defense, adapting to sophisticated threats like AI-driven attacks and zero-day exploits. This comprehensive analysis compares firewall solutions across major platforms—BSD, Linux, Windows, and macOS.
Based on recent benchmarks, market reports, and vulnerability disclosures, we evaluate effectiveness according to performance, security, usability, and features.
📊 Comparison Methodology
Architectural Context
This analysis compares three distinct architecture types:
- Open-Source Solutions(pfSense, OPNsense, nftables): Software requiring separate hardware, offering maximum configuration flexibility
- Native Solutions(Windows Defender, macOS): Firewalls integrated into operating systems, optimized for their ecosystem
Evaluation Criteria
- Performance(30%): Throughput, latency, resource usage
- Security(35%): Filtering capabilities, DPI, threat detection
- Ease of Use(20%): Interface, configuration, learning curve
- Features(15%): VPN, IDS/IPS, HA, integrations
Test Conditions
- Standard Test Hardware: Intel Xeon CPU, 16GB RAM, 10GbE network (for open-source solutions)
- Data Sources: Netgate, Red Hat, Microsoft, Apple, CVE databases, Q2 2025 community reports
📈 Global Ranking by Categories
Open-Source Solutions
| Rank | Solution | Platform | Verified Throughput | Score | Optimal Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 1 | pfSense | BSD | 28.6 Gbps (Netgate 8300) | 95/100 | SMEs, advanced customization |
| 🥈 2 | nftables | Linux | >50 Gbps (high-end hardware) | 92/100 | Cloud-native, Kubernetes |
| 🥉 3 | OPNsense | BSD | ~25-35 Gbps | 88/100 | Modern UI, frequent updates |
Integrated Native Solutions
| Rank | Solution | Platform | Throughput | Score | Optimal Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Windows Defender Firewall | Windows | ~10 Gbps | 75/100 | Windows workstations, GPO |
| 2 | macOS Firewall | macOS | ~10 Gbps | 68/100 | Mac users, simplicity |
👹 BSD: Robust Open-Source Foundations
pfSense: The Open-Source Champion
Overview: pfSense, based on FreeBSD, continues to excel in 2025 thanks to its customization and efficiency. With36 G2 awardswon, it remains the open-source leader for SMEs and organizations seeking control and flexibility.
Technical Characteristics
| Characteristic | Verified Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Throughput | 28.6 Gbps | Netgate 8300 Benchmarks |
| Latency | <0.5 ms | Controlled Netgate tests |
| Architecture | Stateful Inspection + DPI | PF (Packet Filter) FreeBSD |
| Main Type | NGFW + SMLI | Multi-layer inspection |
Strengths
| Advantage | Detail |
|---|---|
| ✅ Exceptional performance | On appropriate hardware |
| ✅ Intuitive web interface | And comprehensive |
| ✅ VPN, load balancing, IDS/IPS | Integrated |
| ✅ Active community | And extensive documentation |
| ✅ Commercial support | Available (pfSense Plus) |
Known 2025 Vulnerabilities
| CVE | Description | Severity | Required Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-53392 | Directory traversal allowing arbitrary file reading | Critical | Immediate update to pfSense 2.8.1+ |
| CVE-2025-34177 | Malicious code injection | High | Update required |
OPNsense: Modern UI and Responsiveness
Overview: pfSense fork created in 2015, OPNsense emphasizes a modern interface and frequent updates. Version 25.7.6 (October 2025) introduces Suricata 8 for improved threat detection.
Technical Characteristics
| Characteristic | OPNsense | pfSense |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Throughput | ~25-35 Gbps | 28.6 Gbps |
| Latency | <0.5 ms | <0.5 ms |
| Interface | Modern, clean | Functional, proven |
| Updates | Weekly | Monthly |
| Key Feature | GeoIP, Automation | VPN Load Balancing |
Strengths
| Advantage | Detail |
|---|---|
| ✅ More modern UI | And intuitive than pfSense |
| ✅ Security updates | More frequent |
| ✅ Zenarmor integration | For threat intelligence |
| ✅ nftables support | For increased performance |
| ✅ Multilingual documentation | Available |
Known 2025 Vulnerabilities
| CVE | Description | Severity | Required Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-50989 | Injection vulnerabilities | High | Update to OPNsense 25.7.6+ |
| CVE-2025-26466 | OpenSSH vulnerability <9.9p2 | High | Update required |
🐧 Linux: Scalability and Flexibility
nftables: The New Linux Standard
Overview: Modern successor to iptables, nftables offers superior performance and unified architecture. Massive adoption in Kubernetes and cloud-native environments in 2025.
Technical Advantages
| Metric | nftables | iptables | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Throughput | >50 Gbps | 50 Gbps | Superior scalability |
| Latency | <0.1 ms | <0.2 ms | 50% faster |
| Architecture | Unified (IPv4/IPv6/ARP) | Separate tables | Simplification |
| Rule Complexity | Sets, Maps, Concatenations | Linear rules | Optimization |
Strengths
| Advantage | Detail |
|---|---|
| ✅ Exceptional performance | With bpfilter (kernel optimizations) |
| ✅ Unified architecture | Simplifying IPv4/IPv6 |
| ✅ Ideal for Kubernetes | NFTables kube-proxy mode |
| ✅ No major vulnerabilities | Reported in 2025 |
| ✅ More consistent syntax | And modern |
Optimal nftables Configuration
| Technique | Advantage | Practical Example |
|---|---|---|
| Sets | Allows grouping IP addresses for efficient rules | Creating blacklists of IPs to block with single rule |
| Flowtables | Accelerates packet processing in hardware | Usage for high performance on production servers |
| Family inet | Unified IPv4/IPv6 support | Single configuration for both protocols |
| FirewallD Integration | Simplified user interface | Allows management via scripts or GUI |
2025 Vulnerabilities
- ✅No major CVE reported(October 2025)
Sources:Red Hat Benchmarking nftables|Kubernetes NFTables
🪟 Windows: Integration and Simplicity
Windows Defender Firewall
Overview: Microsoft's native solution integrated into all modern Windows systems, based on Windows Filtering Platform (WFP). Offers perfect integration with GPO and Microsoft Intune.
Technical Characteristics
| Aspect | Windows Defender | Third-Party Solutions | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Impact | 5% slowdown | 17% average | 3.4x lighter |
| Throughput | ~10 Gbps | Variable | Home/SME |
| Management | Native GPO/Intune | Proprietary console | OS integration |
| Architecture | WFP (multi-layer) | Varies | Native kernel |
| Cost | Included in Windows | Separate license | Economical |
Strengths
| Advantage | Detail |
|---|---|
| ✅ Perfect integration | Microsoft ecosystem |
| ✅ Automatic updates | Via Windows Update |
| ✅ Minimal performance impact | System (5%) |
| ✅ Accessible interface | For beginners |
| ✅ Advanced bidirectional filtering | Available |
Known 2025 Vulnerabilities
| CVE | Description | Severity | Required Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-53808 | Privilege escalation (CVSS 6.7) | High | Install KB5062553 (Sept 2025) |
| CVE-2025-54104 | Type confusion allowing SYSTEM code execution | High | Update required |
| CVE-2025-54109 | Windows Firewall service vulnerability | High | Update required |
| CVE-2025-54915 | Vulnerability similar to CVE-2025-53808 | High | Update required |
🍎 macOS: Elegance and Limitations
macOS Application Firewall
Overview: Unique approach centered on applications rather than ports, aligned with Apple's simplicity philosophy. However, 73% increase in macOS malware in 2025 exposes its limitations.
Technical Characteristics
| Characteristic | macOS Firewall | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Application-centered | Filtering by app, not by port |
| Stealth Mode | Port scan protection | Stealth mode anti-reconnaissance |
| Performance | ~10 Gbps | Acceptable but limited vs BSD/Linux |
| Configuration | Basic | Simplified system settings |
| 2025 Recommendation | ⚠️ Insufficient alone | Complement with third-party solution |
Strengths
| Advantage | Detail |
|---|---|
| ✅ Simple configuration | And intuitive |
| ✅ Native integration | macOS |
| ✅ Stealth mode | Against port scans |
| ✅ No configuration required | For average user |
Limitations
| Limitation | Impact |
|---|---|
| ❌ Basic filtering | Compared to NGFW |
| ❌ No DPI | Deep Packet Inspection |
| ❌ Limited control | Over advanced rules |
| ❌ Vulnerable to | Sophisticated threats |
Known 2025 Vulnerabilities
| CVE | Description | Severity | Required Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-43245 | Downgrade issues (macOS Sequoia) | High | Recommendation: Use Little Snitch or Lulu |
| 73% macOS malware increase | Significant threat increase | High | Recommendation: Third-party solution |
📊 Complete Comparison Table: All Firewalls
| Global Rank | Solution | Type | Platform | Verified Throughput | Score | Price | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pfSense | Open-Source | BSD | 28.6 Gbps | 95/100 | Free/Plus | Community/Commercial |
| 2 | nftables | Open-Source | Linux | >50 Gbps | 92/100 | Free | Community |
| 3 | OPNsense | Open-Source | BSD | ~25-35 Gbps | 88/100 | Free | Community/Commercial |
| 4 | Windows Defender | Native | Windows | ~10 Gbps | 75/100 | Included | Microsoft Support |
| 5 | macOS Firewall | Native | macOS | ~10 Gbps | 68/100 | Included | Apple Support |
Price Legend
- Free: Open-source, no license
- Included: Provided with OS, no separate cost
🎯 Selection Guide: Which Firewall For Which Context?
pfSense
SMEs with customization needs, enterprises seeking total control
nftables
Cloud-native, Kubernetes, high-performance environments
OPNsense
Modern UI, frequent updates, technical teams
Decision Table By Scenario
| Usage Context | Recommended Solution | Main Reason | Estimated Budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| Startup/SME (<50 users) | pfSense or OPNsense | Open-source, flexible, community | 2,000-5,000 € (hardware) |
| Growing SME (50-250 users) | pfSense Plus | Optional support, performance | 5,000-15,000 € (hardware + support) |
| Cloud-Native (Kubernetes, microservices) | nftables | Performance, native K8s integration | Free (cloud infra cost) |
| Budget-limited organization | pfSense Community | Free, powerful, active community | 1,000-3,000 € (hardware) |
| Individual Mac developer | macOS Firewall + Little Snitch | Simplicity + application control | 50 € (Little Snitch) |
| Windows home user | Windows Defender | Integrated, free, sufficient for normal use | Included in Windows |
| Hybrid infrastructure (on-prem + cloud) | pfSense Plus | Flexibility, optional support | 5,000-20,000 € (hardware + support) |
Decision Criteria
Choose Open-Source If:
- ✅ Limited budget or open-source preference
- ✅ Internal technical skills available
- ✅ Need for maximum customization
- ✅ Infrastructure <500 users
- ✅ Active community appreciated
Choose Native If:
- ✅ Personal use or small business
- ✅ No targeted sophisticated threats
- ✅ Simplicity > advanced features
- ✅ OS integration priority
🔮 Conclusion and Future Trends
🤖 Integrated AI/ML
Proactive behavioral detection, 45% in 2025 → 75% in 2027
🔒 Zero Trust Architecture
Microsegmentation, continuous verification, 30% in 2025 → 60% in 2026
☁️ Cloud-Native (FWaaS)
Firewall-as-a-Service, agile deployment, 25% in 2025 → 55% in 2027
Pervasive AI/ML
Real-time behavioral detection, 40% reduction in incident response time
Universal Zero Trust
Continuous identity verification, microsegmentation by default
Cloud-First
FWaaS will surpass hardware by 2027 for new installations
📚 Complete Technical Glossary
Essential Network Security Terms
🛠️ Community Insights: Real Problems and Solutions
macOS Sequoia Problems (2025)
| Problem | Impact | Solution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network connectivity post-update | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Critical | Replace defective cables, DHCP/static IP MAC-based, temporarily disable firewall | Apple Communities |
| Firewall blocks local LAN | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Major | Adjust rules for specific ports, verify network sharing | Apple Communities |
| Complete blocking = secure tunnel risk | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Major | Bypass Cloudflared, selective exceptions > global blocking | Apple Communities |
| Firewall disabled by default | ⭐⭐⭐ Important | Enable via System > Network > Firewall, add third-party solutions | Apple Communities |
| Non-editable firewall entries | ⭐⭐⭐ Important | Restart in Recovery mode for reset, or Terminal editing pfctl | Apple Communities |
Windows Defender Problems (2025)
| Problem | Impact | Solution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrent app blocking without ungrouping option | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Major | Allow via popup or advanced settings, create custom rules | Microsoft Answers |
| Sudden network share blocking | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Major | Temporary disable test, SMB port exception (445) | Ten Forums |
| FTP blocking despite exceptions | ⭐⭐⭐ Important | Add FTP/Server via "Allow app", verify private/public profiles | Microsoft Answers |
| IT Admin limited access by policies | ⭐⭐⭐ Important | Disconnect work/school accounts via Settings > Accounts | Microsoft Answers |
| Internet completely blocked by antivirus/firewall | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Critical | Adjust rules, reset Defender via security settings | Microsoft Answers |
Unix/Linux/BSD Problems (2025)
| Problem | Impact | Solution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unstable OpenVPN on pfSense remote access | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Major | Configure NAT rules and static routes pfSense | ServerFault |
| NAT fails on pfSense virtualized Hyper-V | ⭐⭐⭐ Important | Enable promiscuous mode Hyper-V switch, adjust pfSense interfaces | ServerFault |
| Proxmox installation with Linux/Windows hosting and firewall | ⭐⭐⭐ Important | Use nftables for host firewall, isolate VMs | ServerFault |
| Jumbo frames (MTU 9000) not working on Linux network | ⭐⭐⭐ Important | Verify MTU on all devices, adjust nftables support | ServerFault |
✅ 2025 Firewall Security Checklist
Monthly
Consult vendor official sites for latest versions and security patches. Check automatic notifications.
Look for unusual connection attempts, unauthorized access, or traffic anomalies. Use SIEM analysis tools if available.
Verify configurations can be restored in case of problem. Perform restoration tests on test system.
Test VPN connections to ensure they work correctly and permissions are proper.
Quarterly
Remove obsolete rules, verify current rules relevance, ensure they meet current security needs.
Identify and remove rules no longer needed to reduce attack surface and improve performance.
Update network diagrams, service descriptions, and firewall rule justifications.
Simulate primary firewall failure and verify backup system works correctly.
Consult CVE databases for vulnerabilities affecting your firewall models and plan necessary patches.
Annually
Evaluate if update to newer version or more modern solution is justified.
Measure current firewall performance to ensure it meets business needs.
Hire external provider to evaluate effectiveness of implemented security measures.
Evaluate opportunity to adopt Zero Trust architecture to improve security.
Update team knowledge on latest threats and bypass techniques.
🚨 Critical Alert: Active Vulnerabilities (October 2025)
| CVE | Product | Severity | Impact | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-53392 | pfSense | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Critical | Arbitrary file reading | Immediately update to 2.8.1+ |
| CVE-2025-50989 | OPNsense | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High | Malicious injection | Update to 25.7.6+ |
| CVE-2025-53808 | Windows Defender | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High | Privilege escalation | Install KB5062553 (Sept 2025) |
Average exploitation time after CVE disclosure: 14 days
Percentage of vulnerable systems after 30 days: 43%
⏰Don't wait: Patch within 48 hours of CVE publication
📄 License and Usage
Document Information
Author: SafeIT Experts
Initial publication date: June 24, 2025
Last update: October 24, 2025
Version: 2.0 (Complete 2025 revision)
Usage: This document may be freely shared for educational and non-commercial purposes with appropriate attribution.
Disclaimer: Information is provided "as is". Performance may vary depending on configurations. Always test in non-production environment before critical deployment.
📚 Verified Sources and Citations
Official Manufacturer Sources
- Netgate pfSense Performance Benchmarks
- OPNsense Official Roadmap 2025
- Microsoft Windows Firewall Documentation
- Apple macOS Security Content
Vulnerability Databases (CVE)
- NVD CVE-2025-53392 (pfSense Directory Traversal)
- NVD CVE-2025-50989 (OPNsense Injection)
- CVE-2025-53808 (Windows Defender Privilege Escalation)
- Apple CVE-2025-43245 Security Advisory
Technical Documentation and Benchmarks
- Red Hat - Benchmarking nftables
- Kubernetes - NFTables kube-proxy Mode
- Netfilter Official nftables Project
/image%2F7127247%2F20250616%2Fob_762064_comparatif-firewall-bsd-windows-macos.png)
/image%2F7127247%2F20251109%2Fob_621f28_analyse-security.jpg)
/image%2F7127247%2F20251109%2Fob_e1f91c_analyse-security.jpg)
/image%2F7127247%2F20251026%2Fob_285bcc_5d6ef410-e37e-4bc1-9c03-08351b73218a.jpg)
/image%2F7127247%2F20251109%2Fob_621f28_analyse-security.jpg)
/image%2F7127247%2F20251109%2Fob_e1f91c_analyse-security.jpg)
/image%2F7127247%2F20250629%2Fob_bcf951_immutable-systems-social.png)
/image%2F7127247%2F20251107%2Fob_ea83ba_immutable-systems-social.png)